Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAZUA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 00:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GAZUA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rrod'ed this as WP:NOTDICT; prod removed by page creator. I guess a Korean speaker would be able to read the 'sufficient references', but I do so see that the fact that somebody has used the word on TV makes it notable. TheLongTone (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think I suggested enough sources that prove this word is spoken in South Korea widely and news articles mainly covered this word. --Motoko C. K. (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTDICT.TheLongTone (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that policy. I want to read other user's opinion. --Motoko C. K. (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested other articles that mainly cover this word. --Motoko C. K. (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Delete"--H.L.LEE (talk) 00:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article definitely falls foul of WP:NOTDIC. It fails to introduce any real notariety, given most of the article is concerned with describing the word only, and would be perfect on Wiktionary instead. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 20:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.